MD/DC BOARD ANNUAL PLANNING MEETING
DECEMBER 5, 2003
Present : Sherri
Vucci, Gary Viola, John Jensen, Dan Branigan, Sarah High, Kevin Mann, Vassie
Hollamon, Don Hetrick, Richard Weil, Michelle Estep
1.
Strategic Planning
a.
Review ERAPPA Strategic Planning Questionnaire and Board Responses
b.
Provide MD/DC Board feedback on results and add our responses
·
Sherri passed out the
ERRAPPA bylaws and the responses to the Strategic Planning Initiatives that
ERAPPA had received from SNERAPPA.
Question #1
·
The board agreed with the
current ERAPPA board structure.
·
APPA is looking at student
chapters. These chapters will be
made up of students who are in a program to become future facilities
professionals.
·
The group would like to see
more references to the chapters that make up ERAPPA in the bylaws.
This could be included in Article III.
·
The question was raised
concerning the function of APPA. Is
the organization intended to function from the top-down with local chapters
supporting the Executive Board of APPA or is it intended to function as a bottom
up organization with the Executive Board supporting the local chapters.
·
Sarah just attended an APPA
Membership Committee meeting. She
told us that APPA counts on the local chapters to recruit and retain members.
Question #2
·
Vassie stated that the
MD/DC chapter focus and APPA’s focus should be on outcomes and supporting our
institutions mission.
Question #3
·
One of the strengths that
we see is in the makeup of the membership.
It is diverse and offers a broad view of many common issues.
·
Another strength is in the
ability of members to have multiple contacts within the chapter and outside of
the chapter.
Question #4
·
One weakness was that we
often present ideas that may be above the level of our audience and do not map
out a pathway for those in attendance to get to the issue presented.
·
Another weakness is in the
appearance that the organization (ERAPPA and APPA) can appear closed to outside
participation.
·
A third weakness is that we
do not take advantage of our combined purchasing power.
Question #5
·
The board thought that
packages targeted at first time attendees should be distributed at chapter
meetings. ERPAPPA does this already
but we need ERAPPA and APPA information to distribute at our meetings.
Question #6
·
One threat is the sense
that we are an organization that is not open to new ideas or new members.
·
Another is that we are
strictly a higher education, thus the name, and not available to the K-12
markets and others who may be interested in joining.
Question #7
·
Nothing to add.
2.
Planning for the coming year meetings
a.
Locations for the Spring and Fall Meetings.
If we can lock down locations ahead of time, that
would take one major item off our plates at the meeting so if you have some
contacts out there please reach out to them and discuss the possibility of their
hosting a meeting. We usually have
the most success meeting around Baltimore for one meeting and Washington for the
second meeting but Gary suggested that we may want to reach out to the Eastern
Shore of MD this year to include those that won't travel to the west.
He also suggested St. Mary's as a possibility.
These suggestions can be sent to John Jensen and he will compile a list. They should include the location, contact person, and if the
possibility of a meeting has already been discussed with that person.
· We discussed the need for a more formalized business meeting at our chapter meetings. Although they take up time, the board feels that we have gotten away from this very important way to convey information to the attendees.
· The Spring Meeting will be on March 26, 2004, at Towson University.
· The planning meeting will be on February 27, 2004, also at Towson University. Directions and details will be forwarded from John Jensen who is the contact.
· Topics for this meeting will be:
o Reliability Centered Maintenance - Sherri is the point person for this session.
o Diversity – Michelle is the point person for this session
o Master Planning – John Jensen is the point person for this session
All session
descriptions are due to John by February 15th for the mailing.
Sponsors for this event will be solicited from:
· Ayres St. Gross – John Jensen
· York International – Sherri
· Nalco – Gary
Sponsorships are $300.00
each and will offset the cost of the meeting.
·
The planning meeting on February 27th will be used to
discuss Rocky Gap IV. Plan to spend
the majority of the day at Towson.
· The Fall Meeting will be Friday September 10, 2004, at a location to be determined.
· Vassie will contact AACC or the school board office in Anne Arundel County to see if we can encourage the K – 12 markets to attend this meeting.
· Topics for this meeting may be:
o Roofing – Garland Roofing and Kevin Mann
o Building Envelopes – Gale and Associates
o
Specialty Coatings – Belzoa
·
Follow up meetings will be held at Towson and Rocky Gap to work
out the details concerning this meeting.
3.
Discussion of By-law revisions
·
Vassie passed out that he had prepared
comparing APPA, ERAPPA, and the MD/DC APPA by-laws.
·
We reviewed past discussion on this
subject which included:
o
Change
MD/DC by-laws to better reflect the structure of ERAPPA.
o
Leave
our by-laws as they are.
o
The
current review committee is Dan, Vassie, and Kevin. They are to review the by-laws and changes and try to map our
by-laws after ERAPPA and APPA.
o
It
was suggested that the new structure could include a director’s pool.
We could face the problem of not filling the president elect, treasurer,
or secretary because of the current limitations in the by-laws.
These positions could be elected from the director’s pool.
o
The
issue was raised that a board member in the director’s pool with little
experience could be elected as president elect. It was pointed out that anyone
that would be elected to the director’s pool would be in that position for at
least one year before they would be eligible to run for any other position
because of the election process. If
they were elected in the fall of 2004, they would not be eligible to run for
president elect in the fall of 2004. They
would be eligible in the fall of 2005 after completing one year.
This would resolve the issue.
o
The
decision was made to have Dan, Vassie and Kevin make recommendations at the
February planning meeting.
4.
Topics for education sessions for both meetings.
This is another topic that can be compiled into a list and readied for
discussion at the meeting. If you
have some suggestions provide them to John and he will compile the list of
suggestions and the presenters that are available. We may want to include the three areas that APPA focuses on,
Operations and Maintenance, Administration, and Design and Construction.
See
topic #3
5.
Topics and ideas for Rocky Gap – Again send the ideas to John and he
will compile a list of them to be discussed.
These topics should include What will be presented, who will present, and
how long the presenter will need for the topic (ideally we can use the same
presenter for both days but this may not be possible and we may need a backup
for the second day)
6.
Discussion related to having each Board Member attend another local
chapter meeting.
7.
Discussion of format for Business Meeting prior to the start of each
chapter meeting.
a.
Committee Reports
b.
ERAPPA/APPA update
c.
Any additional items?
Respectfully Submitted 1/6/2004 – John F. Jensen
please e-mail any feedback to: MD/DC APPA Webmaster